In an increasingly digital world, online banking has become a staple of everyday life for Canadians. From making simple transfers to applying for loans, banking via a screen is the norm. However, when it comes to accessibility and usability, there’s much to be examined. Are Canada’s major financial institutions truly meeting the needs of all their customers, including those with disabilities? And are they complying with the standards set to ensure equitable access?
Accessibility and Usability in Canada’s Online Banking Landscape
Online banking in Canada is generally functional, but its accessibility remains a concern for many. Accessibility, in this context, means ensuring that people with various disabilities—whether visual, auditory, motor, or cognitive—can easily navigate and complete banking tasks on digital platforms. Usability, on the other hand, refers to how intuitive, efficient, and easy the platform is for the average user. While many Canadian banks have made strides in improving their digital services, these platforms are not universally accessible or user-friendly for all demographics.
The Canadian government has implemented regulations, such as the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA) and the Canadian Standards Association’s (CSA) accessibility guidelines, to address this gap. However, these regulations largely focus on ensuring physical spaces (like bank branches) are accessible to all. They’ve been slower to address the nuances of digital spaces.
Online banking in Canada can be quite a challenge for people with disabilities. Websites and apps often rely on small fonts, complex navigational structures, and a lack of compatibility with screen readers and other assistive technologies. While certain banks have made efforts to accommodate customers with accessibility needs, there’s still room for improvement.
Are the Big Five Banks Doing Enough?
The big five banks in Canada—RBC, TD, Scotiabank, BMO, and CIBC—have significantly improved their online banking offerings over the years. However, the question remains: are they doing enough to ensure both accessibility and usability for all?
These institutions have considerable resources at their disposal, and many have invested in building user-friendly interfaces, mobile apps, and websites. RBC, for example, has incorporated voice-assisted technologies and improved their website for those with visual impairments. Similarly, TD Bank has made strides with their accessibility policies, offering customizable text sizes, screen reader support, and easy navigation options.
However, the reality is more complex. For some individuals with specific needs, even the most well-intentioned features are insufficient. Banks often provide features such as adjustable text sizes or simplified navigation, but these measures don’t always address the full spectrum of accessibility challenges. Moreover, accessibility tends to be viewed as an afterthought for many institutions, with efforts appearing more like compliance with minimal standards rather than a genuine commitment to making banking easier for everyone.
Do the Big Banks Truly Understand Accessibility and Usability?
When it comes to accessibility, the key question is whether the big banks truly understand its broader implications. Accessibility is not merely about following the letter of the law; it’s about creating an inclusive environment where all customers, regardless of their physical or cognitive abilities, can enjoy a seamless experience.
While many of the major banks have policies in place to enhance accessibility, these measures sometimes feel more like checkboxes ticked off to avoid liability rather than true investments in usability. For instance, RBC’s mobile app has a lot of accessibility features, but its website has faced criticism for being poorly designed for those with visual impairments. TD Bank has made efforts in adapting their digital services to be more accessible, but their mobile app has received mixed reviews in terms of ease of use.
A genuine commitment to accessibility requires consistent effort, user testing with individuals who have disabilities, and continuous improvement. Based on current evidence, many banks are still grappling with fully integrating accessibility into their digital strategy. In many cases, they’re making incremental changes rather than adopting a holistic, inclusive design approach.
Is Non-Compliance the Preferred Path?
Given the increasing regulatory pressure surrounding accessibility, there’s an ethical and financial question: do banks comply out of genuine concern, or do they only do so to avoid penalties? It’s not hard to suspect that, in some cases, the latter might be true.
Penalties for non-compliance with accessibility standards can be significant, especially for institutions with large digital footprints. Yet, it’s also evident that many banks prefer to make incremental changes rather than redesign their entire infrastructure to fully meet accessibility requirements. This piecemeal approach—often driven by budgetary concerns or a lack of understanding of the importance of accessibility—appears to reflect a preference for paying fines rather than incurring the higher costs of compliance.
There’s a legal risk, too. As more individuals with disabilities become aware of their rights and the tools available to them, there’s an increasing likelihood of class-action lawsuits. The recent legal challenges against other sectors for non-compliance serve as a reminder that accessibility is not just a moral or social issue—it’s becoming a legal one as well.
Which Banks Are Truly Complying?
Among Canada’s major banks, there are some that stand out for their efforts to comply with accessibility standards. TD Bank is a clear leader, consistently scoring high marks for its accessible mobile apps, websites, and physical banking spaces. The bank has actively engaged with the community to improve its services and has made it a point to implement user feedback, particularly from those with disabilities.
RBC, while offering some accessible features, has room to improve its website and mobile apps for users with disabilities. BMO and Scotiabank also have accessibility features in place but tend to lag behind TD in terms of overall usability. CIBC is often seen as the weakest of the big five in terms of accessibility efforts, with many users reporting difficulties navigating their website and app.
The Path Forward: Beyond Compliance
It’s clear that online banking in Canada has made significant strides in recent years, but the journey towards full accessibility and usability is far from complete. The major banks must do more than simply meet legal obligations—they must build a truly inclusive digital experience. That requires a commitment to long-term investment, continuous user feedback, and an emphasis on inclusive design.
Canada’s big banks have the resources to lead the way in creating a more accessible digital landscape. Now, it’s up to them to ensure that they’re not only compliant but also genuinely committed to meeting the diverse needs of their customers. As Canadians continue to embrace online banking, it’s imperative that no one is left behind due to digital barriers.
Image = a photo of someone logging into their online banking system on their laptop
To learn more about me as an award-winning sight loss coach and advocate visit https://donnajodhan.com.